Greasemonkey, the Google toolbar and the RIAA
I checked out Greasemonkey for the first time today, and thought: uh-oh, shake-up coming. Greasemonkey is essentially a delivery mechanism (in the form of a Firefox plugin) for dHTML scripts. One such script, for instance, removes Google Adsense from pages.
Why is this important? Well, because it asks some very pertinent questions for media owners attempting to run businesses on the Web.
Question 1: what is a web page? Up until fairly recently, there was an easy metaphor for a web page. It was a digitised form of content which you could either sell (via subscription) or monetise with advertising. It was, in lots of ways, analogous to a newspaper page: relatively fixed.
But now, that analogy is rapidly breaking apart: RSS breaks it apart, because now I don’t need to visit the page to consume some of it. Greasemonkey breaks it apart, because now I can make changes on the fly to the page as it suits me. Google’s new toolbar breaks it apart, because now links that don’t belong to me as the web page publisher are now appearing (so does Google own some of my page now?). The Opera mobile phone browser breaks it apart, because now my web page is being reconfigured on the fly in order to appear on a different device.
None of these things need involve me, as a publisher (even RSS feeds can be created by scraping my original web page). It’s as if a newsagent could take a newspaper and change it utterly, right down to removing the advertising, before selling it to a reader.
Question 2: who owns a web page? Again, that’s been pretty clear up until now - if I, as a publisher, put a web page out, I own it. There are even terms of use governing how people can use my web page. But as the model of the web page breaks down, how does this ownership change? If a user has written a script to alter the appearance of my page (legally or illegally), don’t they share in its ownership (I’m talking about perceptions here, not legal contracts)? And if I don’t like what they’ve done to my page (such as taking the advertising out) how do I enforce my ownership effectively? Are we all going to turn into the RIAA?
Question 3: what do we call the emerging “user-created environment” where personal RSS readers combine with Greasemonkeyed/hacked websites and del.icio.us shared taxonomies to create something amorphous and fundamentally “not-owned” other than by an individual end-user? And, on the assumption that nobody is going to create really difficult content all the time unless they can make a business out of it, how can business models be preserved in this open primordial soup?
Big questions. One facetious meta-question: just what the hell are we doing here?
February 22nd, 2005 at 2:22 pm
Greasemonkey and Ajax
Lloyd just pointed me at Greasemonkey which looks very interesting. Throw it together with something built using Ajax and suddenly…
February 22nd, 2005 at 8:48 pm
Gloriously messy, isn’t it. I think one of the big issues here is the difference between the ability to rip, mix and burn content, and the willingness to put the time and effort into doing it. I seem to recall studies suggesting that the vast majority of people never even change the default home page there browser sets from them.
February 22nd, 2005 at 8:49 pm
Oops. “their browser” of course.
February 22nd, 2005 at 9:37 pm
LOSING/GAINING CONTROL
Lloyd points to some more change that goes to the heart of the question “who owns your stuff.” Among them: Greasemonkey, a Firefox browser add on that delivers easily developed DHTML scripts that can perform such functions as removing Google Adsense …
February 22nd, 2005 at 10:47 pm
Here’s the directory of user scripts so far.
February 23rd, 2005 at 10:14 am
Greasemonkey and Ajax
Lloyd just pointed me at Greasemonkey which looks very interesting. Throw it together with something built using Ajax and suddenly…