In my first interview to be the chairman of Channel 4, the panel asked me what I thought of public service broadcasting. Obviously I had no idea what they meant, so I waffled and got away with it.
So that’s all right then.
February 8th, 2010 | Comments
Category: Work | Tags:
Very interesting point made in a generally very interesting Economist article: the decline of local news is contributing to Britain’s panic over crime:
Yet Britons refuse to do the same, and for this their newspapers, which seldom look on the sunny side of life, are much to blame. “NAME THE DEVIL BOYS—WE MUST NOT LET THEM HIDE”, roared the Mail on Sunday on January 24th, quoting the parents of the Edlington victims. Newspapers were no less lurid a century ago. But there is one big change: a shift in readership from local papers to national ones. Mr Cameron’s comfortable Witney constituents are dropping the Oxford Mail in favour of national titles or the television, which report the most gruesome stories from across the country, not just the county. In this way local crises, such as an outbreak of teenage stabbings in London in 2007 and 2008, become national panics, causing fear even in regions where the problem does not exist. And bad news travels best: the fact that London’s teenage-murder rate quietly halved last year was not widely reported outside the capital.
You can’t make a living selling classical recordings in America (which presumably means anywhere):
A leaked copy of the SoundScan figures for a single week from the fall tells an equally sad tale. In early October, pianist Murray Perahia’s much-praised album of Bach partitas was in its sixth week on the list, holding strong at No. 10. It sold 189 copies. No. 25, the debut of the young violinist Caroline Goulding, in its third week, sold 75 copies.
Which begs the question: how many records are being sold in the mainstream charts? Classical music represents 3% of recorded music sales. So if you can get to No.10 with 189 sales in America in classical, can you get to No. 10 with (189/3)*100, or 6,300 sales?
Some consumers have objected that e-books must be cheaper to make than ink-on-paper books. A simple cost breakdown by Money magazine last year, however, suggested that only about 10 percent of a book's list price goes to printing. But ink-on-paper books have to be shipped, stored, and (when they go unsold) returned, and e-books would be spared these costs, too, as this analysis suggests. Also, according to TBI Research, because e-books are likely to end up with a lower list price after the dust clears, author royalties, calculated as a percentage of the list price, are likely to be lower, too—additional savings! Yay! When all these savings are added up, do you succeed in dropping a list price of $28 to one of $9.95? That’s a big drop. Profit margins at book publishers now are rumored to be no more than 10 percent, where they exist at all. It may not be possible for a single company to publish e-books at that price and also retain the infrastructure necessary to publish ink-on-paper books.
(Here’s a message from Merlin, the charity for which I am a Trustee, and which is doing sterling, amazing, brilliant work on the ground in Haiti).
The Haiti earthquake has, as you will be aware, generated a ground swell of support from every corner of society. Six British artists and Giles Baker-Smith of GBS Fine Art have come together to donate six fantastic pieces to raise funds for Merlin’s work in Haiti. With five pieces available for individuals, this unique online fundraising appeal and prize draw, limited to 100 tickets, provides you with a 1 in 20 chance of winning a piece of art. And for corporations we have one larger installation, which would sit well in a corporate setting. Tickets for this piece are £500, with only 20 tickets available. All the pieces, valued between £1,500 and £6,500, are on offer today, so please read on for details of how to enter the prize draw and make your donation to Merlin’s emergency response in Haiti. Both draws are a great opportunity to support the Haiti Appeal and have the chance of winning some great art! Do pass this on to anyone who may be interested.
For Individuals: To enter the prize draw click this dedicated link and make a minimum recommended donation of £100*
The artists in question are: Sean Fairman, who has provided the corporate piece; Emily Allchurch; Veronica Bailey (and in relation to her piece, by kind donation of Coutts & Co); Susannah Baker-Smith; and Robert Davies. Merlin extends a huge thank you to these artists and to Giles Baker-Smith who initiated this appeal.
Using Foursquare or Gowalla represents such a minimal amount of effort and energy – normally in a moment of your day when you’re not doing anything else – that you only need a tiny amount of reward for it to be worthwhile. And, actually, for quite a lot of people, quite a lot of the point is in seeing how much point there is.
Recent research from ResearchICTAfrica reveals that Kenyans are spending incredible amounts on mobile communication as a proportion of income. Here’s how it breaks down. The average Kenyan spends over 50% of their disposable income on mobile communication. For the bottom 75% of the population, that figure goes up to 63.6%. In terms of total individual income, the average Kenyan spends 16.7% of their income on mobile communication. That figure rises to 26.6% when looking at the bottom 75% of the population. These figures are astounding. It highlights the fact that Africans are paying for mobile communication in spite of how expensive it is, not because of how affordable it is.
Go and indulge yourself in the Internet equivalent of apple pie and cream: a complete, internally consistent but externally insane analysis of what Kubrick’s The Shining is really about:
The truth is that The Shining is the story of how Stanley Kubrick cut a deal with the U.S. Government to fake the Apollo moon landings.
It is also the story of how Kubrick may have accidentally told someone what he had done and how that person had to be killed.
The Shining is also the story of how faking the Apollo moon landings almost sacrificed his relationship with his wife.
Finally it is the story of how Stanley Kubrick barely escaped alive to create another day.
The Shining is the story of how a part of Stanley Kubrick was killed by the agreement that he made with the U. S. government to become the “caretaker” of The Project called A11 or Apollo 11.
It is also the story of the history of NASA.
This explains why the previous “caretaker” was so pressured and stressed that he had to kill his TWIN daughters.
Why?
Because the previous NASA missions before Apollo were named Gemini!
The thing I really loved about it is that the assumption of meaning in every symbol and the worship of allusion would not be out of place in some of the English literature texts I read at uni. They’re full of crap like the stuff in this essay. “If x means y, then we can assume that y means z, and Eliot is actually talking about bullfighting.”
From the always excellent Strange Maps, this satirical 1940 map of Ireland designed to show the place in as grim a light as possible to discourage possible invaders. I’m wondering if a similar thing might be done about certain corporations to prevent people from wanting to work at them….
I’ve been thinking about this as the opening shots are fired in what is clearly going to be the first Twitter election, where any issue that can’t be boiled down to 140 characters won’t play. 140 characters is enough room for a slogan or a meretricious appeal; it’s not enough to say anything more useful. In that sense Stalin would have loved it. Lincoln not so much.
The Net as a medium is not for anything in particular — not for making calls, sending videos, etc. It also works at every scale, from one to one to many to many. This makes it highly unusual as a medium. In fact, we generally don’t treat it as a medium but as a world, rich with connections, persistent, and social. Because everything we encounter in this world is something that we as humans made (albeit sometimes indirectly), it feels like it’s ours. Obviously it’s not ours in the property sense. Rather, it’s ours in the way that our government is ours and our culture is ours. There aren’t too many other things that are ours in that way.
# Flow is the feed. It’s the posts and the tweets. It’s the stream of daily and sub-daily updates that remind people that you exist.
# Stock is the durable stuff. It’s the content you produce that’s as interesting in two months (or two years?) as it is today. It’s what people discover via search. It’s what spreads slowly but surely, building fans over time.
And yet somehow, at some point during the summer of 2009, I started cranking out more and more ambitious code. My PHP efforts went beyond straightforward HTML templates with WordPress tags dropped in. I wasn’t scared to look at javascript. Next thing I know, I’m writing WordPress plugins and pretty advanced javascript/Ajax routines. I’m scraping web pages in their thousands, to get data in the form I want. All stuff I knew was possible, and probably understood on a superficial level – but here I am, doing it. Dammit. So how on earth did I get here?
In this piece on Google in 2010, Cringely says something lovely:
Taking a guess about what’s happening there I predict that HTC warned Google about the radio problem but there were so many IQ points jetting around the conference room at Google that nobody bothered to actually listen they were so much in love with each other
UPDATE: Cringely’s on a roll. In another 2010 predictions post, he proposes outsourcing tracking of illegal aliens to the credit agencies and tells an extraordinary tale about how Homeland Security reacted to his famous column on social security numbers (which I can’t find a link to, but he quotes the relevant bit in this latest post). Read it, it’s essential.
So, there’s no organised effort to get Rod Liddle imprisoned, tortured, fined or even made to sit on the naughty step for what he’s published. Just a strong and widespread feeling that he’d be a disaster in the job. And despite what Bennett suggests, freedom of speech means, exactly, freedom of speech. Not “freedom to edit national newspapers”. And definitely not “freedom from being criticised by anyone who doesn’t have a newspaper column”. Because when Bennett worries that “Public figures will become ever blander in their views” if they continue to be exposed to opposition, what she’s arguing is that public figures should be protected from opposition.
One wonders what on earth has happened to Catherine Bennett, who used to be trenchant and clever and now comes across like some watered-down urban Melanie Phillips. this recent column begins “perhaps it’s just age” which seems to me the intellectual equivalent of throwing in the towel and declining any curiosity in anything new.
SIR WILLIAM BLACKSTONE, an 18th-century jurist who wrote a famous four-volume history of English law, described a man’s right to trial by his peers as “the principal bulwark of our liberties”. Almost 250 years later, this way of dispensing justice has greatly diminished; magistrates routinely hear criminal cases without jurors. However, for the past four centuries serious crimes in England and Wales have always been tried before a jury. On January 12th the trial of four men accused of armed robbery began at the Royal Courts of Justice in London heard by a judge alone, the first such case in modern times